Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Barnes

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1988No. 87-115PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

I

At the outset, we consider whether this cause has been rendered moot by adjournment of the meeting at issue. We note that the Cleveland City Council has engaged in a practice of excluding the press and public from certain of its meetings. Such meetings will normally adjourn before the practice of exclusion is subjected to judicial review. Although a case may be moot, a court may hear the appeal where the issues raised are “capable of repetition, yet evading review.” Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. ICC (1911), 219 U.S. 498, 515. Thus, because this case raises important issues concerning…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovernOhio Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. City of Urbana ex rel. Newlin v. DowningOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Department of Liquor Control v. Sons of Italy Lodge 0917Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hughes v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Holeski v. LawrenceOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. DonaldsonOhio Supreme Court · 1992

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API