Legal Opinion

City of Urbana ex rel. Newlin v. Downing

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1989No. 88-30PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The defendants-appellants raise ten propositions of law, including challenges to the jurisdiction of the Urbana Municipal Court to rule whether the five magazines at issue are obscene. For the reasons that follow we affirm the lower court’s rulings.

In their first and third propositions of law, the defendants-appellants challenge the subject-matter jurisdiction of the Urbana Municipal Court to hear this declaratory judgment action. The trial court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss based upon the same arguments regarding subject-matter jurisdiction. The defendants then filed their answer and…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. County of Kenosha v. C & S MANAGEMENT, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. KehoeOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. State v. SibertOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Pizza v. StropeOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API