Legal Opinion
Pilon v. Yard
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 1, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
The determination of the claims of law made by the plaintiff on this appeal depends largely upon the proper construction of the applicable rules and regulations governing civil service in Hartford. No rules or regulations whatever are in the finding or elsewhere in the printed appeal record.
An exhibit of the plaintiff purports to be a compilation of such rules and regulations “Adopted— November, 1948; Amended—April 1, 1953.” Paragraph 66 of the finding reads as follows: “All exhibits admitted in evidence in the trial of this action are hereby made a part of this Finding and may be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Appeal of PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Goldblatt v. FerrignoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Karen v. Town of East HaddamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Martin v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Thorne v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- New York East Annual Conference v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Goldman v. CoppolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- EMJ CORPORATION v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.