Legal Opinion

Thorne v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 16, 1968PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

On April 17, 1964, the plaintiffs, whose properties adjoin and are adjacent to the property of the defendant Clarinda DeLeo, appealed *620to the defendant board from the decision of the zoning enforcement officer of the city of Stamford, dated March 11, 1964, wherein he concluded that the premises owned by Clarinda DeLeo were used as a legally nonconforming two-family dwelling in a one-family zone. On July 1, 1964, the board denied the plaintiffs’ appeal. Upon the appeal to the Court of Common Pleas, the trial court sustained the action of the board and dismissed the appeal. From the judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Krejpcio v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  2. Pascale v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  3. Miklus v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  4. Willard v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  5. Nielson v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Lawrence v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  5. General Electric Supply Co. v. Southern New England Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API