Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Coppola
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 6, 1962PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
The defendants, Donald and Anthony Coppola, were brothers. For some years prior to 1955, they had owned a corporation known as Dan’s Auto Sales, Inc., which was engaged in the used-car business. In 1955, Anthony purchased the stock of Clare Motors, Inc., which held the Chrysler franchise in New Haven. The name of this corporation was changed to A. Coppola Motor Sales, Inc. There after, Dan’s Anto Sales, Inc., was merged into A. Coppola Motor Sales, Inc. The details of these corporate maneuvers were complex and not all are clearly disclosed in the finding. At and after the merger, both…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Moore v. BaySupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Northrop's executors v. GravesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
- Canfield v. GregorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Crandall v. LincolnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
- Lowndes v. City National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bertozzi v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Southern New England Contracting Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Walter Kidde Constructors, Inc. v. StateConnecticut Superior Court · 1981
- Jennings v. Reale Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Baxter v. Lancer Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.