Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 17, 1982No. SPCM 16049PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JONES, Senior Judge:

The appellant asserts that his conviction by special court-martial for a 417-day unauthorized absence, after a board of officers had refused to eliminate him from the service for the same absence, was a result of prosecutorial vindictiveness and therefore a violation of his right to due process. We disagree and we affirm.

The command initiated elimination proceedings against appellant pursuant to Chapter 14, Army Regulation 635-200, because of an unauthorized absence in excess of one year. The board of officers that heard the case recommended retention…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. FretwellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  2. United States v. BassU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
  3. United States v. HicklinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. BlanchetteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  2. United States v. BlockerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. RiceDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1996
  4. United States v. BlockerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API