United States v. Hicklin
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JONES, Senior Judge:
The appellant was tried on a charge and specification which purportedly set out the offense of robbery in violation of Article 122, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 922.1 He pleaded guilty to the lesser included offense of larceny and was convicted in accordance with his plea. The sentence as adjudged and approved by the convening authority extended to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for two months and forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for two months.
This case involves questions of (a) the providence of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. FrangoulesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. ShulthiseUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. ReevesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- United States v. RiosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. ClarkeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. NelsonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. JacksonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993