Legal Opinion

United States v. Hicklin

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided October 30, 1979No. SPCM 13876PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JONES, Senior Judge:

The appellant was tried on a charge and specification which purportedly set out the offense of robbery in violation of Article 122, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 922.1 He pleaded guilty to the lesser included offense of larceny and was convicted in accordance with his plea. The sentence as adjudged and approved by the convening authority extended to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for two months and forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for two months.

This case involves questions of (a) the providence of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. FrangoulesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. ShulthiseUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  4. United States v. ReevesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  5. United States v. RiosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. United States v. ClarkeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. NelsonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. JacksonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API