United States v. Bass
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JONES, Senior Judge:
In this case we must determine whether the staff judge advocate demonstrated vindictiveness in the prosecution of appellant after the appellant had refused to accept punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 815. A proper treatment of the issue requires us to set forth in some detail a history of the proceedings.
I
Charges were preferred against the appellant on 6 February 1979, alleging rape, sodomy and obstruction of justice.1 The company and battalion commanders recommended trial by general court-martial, as did the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Tallice Andrews and Thurston BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. BlanchetteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. WilliamsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
- Martinez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- United States v. MartinoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. SchefferCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996