Legal Opinion
Davis v. Seneca Falls Mfg. Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided October 21, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
The Seneca Falls Manufacturing Company, Inc., was organized under the laws of the state of New York, and bn November 22, 1922, receivers in equity to conserve the assets of the company and wind up its affairs were appoint ed by this court on complaint and answer admitting the allegations of the bill. After-wards, on application of the receivers, the assets of the defendant wore sold for $150,-000, and the sale was later approved by this court. Thereupon a special master was appointed to take proof of. claims of creditors and of the lien of a trust mortgage on the real…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thompson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- National Bank of Newport v. National Herkimer County Bank of Little FallsSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Horn v. Pere Marquette R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1907
- Joseph v. RaffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- In re Progressive Wall Paper Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Paul Delaney Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1927
- Quinn v. Bancroft-Jones Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1926
- Woodbury v. Pickering Lumber Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1933
- First Nat. Bank of Medford, Or. v. Stewart Fruit Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1927
- Modart, Inc. v. Penrose Industries Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.