Legal Opinion

Horn v. Pere Marquette R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan

Decided February 11, 1907PublishedCited by 54 opinions

In Equity. In re intervening petition of Judson Harmon, receiver, and answer of the State Savings Bank.

1Opinion of the Court

LURTON, Circuit Judge.

At the outset I must make my acknowl-

edgments to the learned counsel who have appeared in this case. Their assistance in investigating the numerous and interesting questions which are herein discussed has'been unusually profitable to me, and I trust will tend to the better understanding of several mooted questions which concern matters of interest touching the appointment and authority of receivers.

The matters now to be considered arise upon an intervening petition filed by Judson Harmon, as receiver of the Pere Marquette Railroad Company, and the answer of the State…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. In Re NeagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Booth v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  5. Toland v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1838

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. United States v. California Coöperative CanneriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Ex parte SteeleDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1908
  3. Blair v. BraileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1915
  4. Weinberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  5. Ex parte HarlanUnited States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida · 1909

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API