Legal Opinion
Woodbury v. Pickering Lumber Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided February 11, 1933No. 1657PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, District Judge.
On May 9, 1931, upon plaintiff’s bill and the answer of the ,defendant, Mr. George R. Hicks was appointed receiver of the defendant company. The plaintiff was a secured bondholder, but the defendant by answer admitted the necessity for the appointment of a receiver to take charge of all its property. Such appointment appeared to be necessary to protect legitimate private interests. The parties joined in recommending the receiver named.
■ The case does not fall within the condemnation of Michigan v. Michigan Trust Co., 286 U. S. 334, loc. cit. 345, 52 S. Ct. 512, 76 L.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Merrill v. National Bank of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Harkin v. BrundageSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Benedict v. RatnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Michigan v. Michigan Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Panther Pumps & Equipment Company, Inc., Now Morrison Pump Co., Inc. v. Hydrocraft, Inc., Paul W. Schlosser and Edward DrathCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Texas Co. v. RoosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Burton v. RoosDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1937
- In Re Chas. K. Horton, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1938
- South Central Enterprises, Inc. v. Farrington (In Re Progressive Farmers Ass'n)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.