Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank of Medford, Or. v. Stewart Fruit Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 19, 1927No. 1642PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERRIGAN, District Judge.
On March 2, 1926, the First National Bank of Medford, Or., a simple contract creditor of the Stewart Fruit Company, filed a bill in equity stating that the Stewart Fruit Company was unable to pay its obligations as they matured, and that its assets were in danger of being dissipated by forced sales, if a receiver were not appointed for the benefit of all creditors. On the same day the Stewart Fruit Company filed its answer, admitting the allegations of the bill, and consenting to the appointment of a receiver. The receiver was appointed by this court.
The Hasegawa…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Re Metropolitan Railway ReceivershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Cincinnati Equipment Co. v. DegnanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. International Steam Pump Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Zechiel v. Firemen's Fund Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Andrews v. Andrews & Andrews, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1942
- Lee v. Riefler & Sons, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1930
- Ali Kane v. Carmack, et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- Ivey v. Housing Foundation of America, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.