Legal Opinion
Denby v. Voloshin Cadillac, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 22, 1985No. 2099PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The plaintiff Paul Denby1 appeals2 from a judgment on a directed verdict in favor of the defendant, Voloshin Cadillac, Inc., as to liability for damage to the plaintiffs automobile.3 We find no error.
*182On or about September 7, 1979, unknown persons removed two wheels and tires from the plaintiffs car which he had left in the custody of the defendant auto dealer for the purposes of repair. The plaintiff was informed of the theft and that no further work would be performed on the car until he replaced the missing wheels and tires. Denby did not replace those items and thereafter the automobile…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- E. J. Hansen Elevator, Inc. v. StollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Pietrorazio v. SantopietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Eagar v. BarronConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Thomas v. CommerfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Cinque v. OrlandoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Smith v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Kolich v. ShugrueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Prishwalko v. Bob Thomas Ford, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.