Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Commerford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 4, 1975PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
These two cases, arising out of the the same automobile accident, were consolidated for trial and have been combined on appeal by stipulation of the parties. In the first case the plaintiff, Clarence Thomas, sought to recover damages for personal injuries and property loss allegedly caused by the negligence of the town of Branford and its employee, Francis Commerford. In the second case, the town of Branford sought to recover property damage allegedly caused by Thomas’s negligence. The jury returned verdicts in favor of Thomas in both cases. The town of Branford moved to,set aside the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Roden v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- State v. TomanelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Waldron v. RaccioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- De Luca v. Board of Park CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McLaughlin v. BronsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Shea v. TousignantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- State v. RussoConnecticut Superior Court · 1982
- Lutkus v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Denby v. Voloshin Cadillac, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.