Legal Opinion

Cinque v. Orlando

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 26, 1954PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWynne, J.

The plaintiffs brought suit against two defendants to collect a bill for services in grading property belonging to the defendant DiBenedetto. Prom a judgment rendered against him that defend ant has appealed. He makes the claim that the plaintiffs rested their case without having offered testimony of any kind bearing upon his liability for the bill in question. A motion for nonsuit was made in his behalf and was denied. Thereafter the trial proceeded. The other defendant, Orlando, testified in his own behalf, as did the defendant DiBenedetto, who failed to rest his case upon the denial of his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leitzes v. F. L. Caulkins Auto Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lopinto v. HainesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. State v. LenihanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  3. Adamsen v. AdamsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  4. Craig v. DunleavySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  5. Allstate Insurance v. BarronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API