Kolich v. Shugrue
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtSantaniello, J.
These appeals1 raise the question whether a party suing the state under General Statutes § 13a-144 must prove that the alleged defect in the state highway was the sole proximate cause of his injuries. The plaintiffs, George Maintanis and Anthony Kolich, the administrator of the estate of Barbara Maintanis, brought separate suits against the state alleging that the state negligently constructed and maintained its highways. The cases were consolidated for trial, and in each case the jury returned a verdict in favor of the state. The court rendered judgments in accordance with the verdicts, and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Lukas v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Pietrorazio v. SantopietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Donnelly v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Grzys v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Falby v. ZarembskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Lamb v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.