Legal Opinion
Prishwalko v. Bob Thomas Ford, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 8, 1994No. 11837PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment following a directed verdict for the defendant on both counts of the plaintiff’s complaint (Gray, J.) and from its denial of summary judgment for the plaintiff on the defendant’s special defense (Licari, J.). The plaintiff sought damages arising out of her purchase of an automobile from the defendant for breach of warranty and under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA, General Statutes § 42-110a et seq.). The defendant’s special defense was that its repurchase of the plaintiffs automobile and cancellation of all of her repair…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Ancona v. Manafort Bros.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Kenney v. Healey Ford-Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Krack v. Action Motors Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Keans v. BocciarelliConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.