Patterson v. Rowe
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
Plaintiff commenced this action for personal injuries and property damage arising out of an automobile collision.. A jury returned a verdict in her favor in _the sum of $6-,000 and judgment was entered in accordance therewith. Plaintiff then moved for a new trial on the ground that the damages awarded were inadequate and the court ordered a new trial on the sole issue of damages unless defendants should, within 10 days, file an offer to pay plaintiff the sum of $10,000. Defendants refused to comply with this order and the court then ordered a new trial on the issue of damages only, on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Dorsey v. BarbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Clifford v. RuoccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- McNear v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Uhl v. BaldwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Bradford v. EdmandsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Spencer v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Linn v. RobyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hansen v. BledsoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.