Legal Opinion

Uhl v. Baldwin

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1956No. Civ. 21767PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

This action for damages arose out of a collision between two automobiles at an intersection. The drivers of the respective vehicles were Mrs. Helen Stremel and Eleanor Baldwin. Riding in the Stremel car was Mrs. Henrietta Uhl, who, with her husband, initiated the present proceedings by-filing an action against defendant Baldwin comprising two counts. The first cause of action was for recovery of damages for personal injuries sustained by Mrs. Uhl, the second was for loss of consortium suffered by Mr. Uhl. This latter count was dismissed by stipulation during the trial. Further references to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Kelley v. Hodge Transportation SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. KecklerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Miller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Frediani v. OtaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Garcia v. San Gabriel Ready MixtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Dimmick v. AlvarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API