Legal Opinion
Bradford v. Edmands
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 17, 1963No. Civ. 19793PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.
In this personal injury ease, plaintiffs are Sam Bradford, a minor, by his guardian ad litem, Kay Ghilardi (his mother), Werner A. Ghilardi, Kay’s husband and stepfather of the boy, for both the boy and his stepfather were injured, and Kay Ghilardi in her own right, claiming the reasonable value of nursing care given to her son. The sole defendant is Eugenia Edmands.
The jury awarded plaintiff Bradford $25,700, and Kay Ghilardi $1,950. It found for defendant and against Werner A. Ghilardi. On motions for new trial the dispositions were: (1) motion for new trial of Bradford “granted upon the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- McNear v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Hughes v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Jehl v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Hair v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Key v. CleggCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
- Bailey v. County of San JoaquinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.