Legal Opinion

Chase v. Bogardus

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 1, 1926No. 11,032PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Bogardus brought suit to quiet title and had a decree. Mary L. Chase, one of the defendants, brings error.

The complaint alleges title in fee simple and possession in plaintiff. The answer denies this and alleges title in fee simple in defendant, Mary L. Chase.

It is claimed that plaintiff showed no title because the tax deed under which he claims is void on its face. It is so for the reason that it shows a sale for taxes on a date later than that required by statute without showing any cause for the delay. Hamer v. Glenn Inv. Co., 75 Colo. 423, 226 Pac. 299. It was necessary for plaintiff to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wall v. MagnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  2. Clark v. HuffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  3. Hamer v. Glenn Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  4. Walters v. WebsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. BachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  2. Kingore v. WallaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. City & County of Denver v. MurrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. Wenig v. LyonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. Howe v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API