Legal Opinion
City & County of Denver v. Bach
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided May 29, 1933No. 12,744PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
John Bach, called herein the plaintiff, sued the City and County of Denver, called herein the defendant, to quiet title to certain lots in Denver. Judgment was ren dered in favor of Bach and the defendant seeks a reversal of the judgment.
Bach claims title under a tax deed executed by the manager of revenue, ex-officio treasurer of the City and County of Denver. If that deed is void on its face, the judgment was wrong and should be reversed; otherwise, the judgment was right and should be affirmed.
Section 7410, Compiled Laws, provides that the tax sale shall commence on or before the second…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McCready v. Sexton & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Eldridge v. KuehlSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
- Lebanon Mining Co. of New York v. RogersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
- Callanan v. HurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hamer v. Glenn Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bald Eagle Mining and Refining Company v. BruntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Board of Com'rs of Pitkin County v. TimrothSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Walter v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
- Richardson v. HalbekannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
- Richardson v. HalbekannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.