Legal Opinion

Hamer v. Glenn Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 3, 1924No. 10,676PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Plaintiff in error brought suit to quiet title, was defeated and brings error.

The defendants relied on a tax deed, dated November 29, 1919, which recited that the tax sale upon which it depended was “begun and publicly held on the 20th day of November, A. D. 1916,” and plaintiff in error claims it was void on its face because the statute, C. L. § 7410, requires the sale to be begun on or before the second Mon*424day in November, which was the 13th. We think the claim must be upheld.

The rulé is unquestioned that the sale is invalid unless held at the time required by the statute. 2 Cooley on Tax.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newsom v. JacobsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. BachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  2. Kingore v. WallaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. Board of Com'rs of Pitkin County v. TimrothSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. City & County of Denver v. MurrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. Chase v. BogardusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API