Legal Opinion

Smith v. Whitman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 4, 1963PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wbintbaub-, C. J.

These cases arose put of embezzlements by Paul A. Yivers, an attorney (now disbarred, Vivers, In re, 36 N. J. 531 (1962)), of property of clients. Defendant Whitman, who is a nephew of Yivers, suffered losses óf about $100,000. He obtained from Yivers assets worth about $39,000 which plaintiffs, also victims of Yivers, sought to recover in these proceedings.

The complaints seemingly advanced two theses: (1) that Yivers held specific properties in trust for plaintiffs and transferred those properties to Whitman who took without…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marbury v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. Kolb v. MallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  3. Merchants Bank v. PageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  4. Wolff v. PerkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Tokar v. RedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Boston Trading Group, Inc. v. Robert A. Burnazos, Boston Trading Group, Inc. v. Robert A. BurnazosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Harris v. WagshalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Marley v. Palmyra Bor.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  4. Jennings v. ReedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  5. Butler v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API