Legal Opinion

Harris v. Wagshal

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 24, 1975No. 7574, 6695 and 7575PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PART I (No. 7574)

2Per curiam

Appellants (the Harrises) bring this appeal from a judgment (a) holding them personally liable on a judgment earlier obtained by appellee (Wagshal) against Georgetown Chateaux, Inc. (hereafter Chateaux), a corporation wholly owned by Mrs. Harris, and (b) awarding $10,000 punitive damages against them in favor of appellee. Appellants contest (1) the correctness of the trial court’s decision to pierce the corporate veil of Chateaux and (2) the propriety of the trial court’s assessment of punitive damages under the circumstances here. They also assert that they were denied a…

3Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Anderson v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Helvering v. San Joaquin Fruit & Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Leon F. Urbain and Loxit Systems, Inc. v. Knapp Brothers Manufacturing Company, Al Levinson, Charles Levinson, and Robert LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by54 opinions

  1. Dewitt Truck Brokers, Inc. v. W. Ray Flemming Fruit Company and W. Ray FlemmingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  2. Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & BonelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Sere v. Group Hospitalization, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Washington Medical Center, Inc. v. HolleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Mendes v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API