Legal Opinion

Tokar v. Redman

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 1956No. Civ. 21130PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE (Paul), J. pro tem. *

By his amended complaint in this action, appellant sought to recover from the respondent Normandie Club and others certain monies which it is alleged were paid to the respondent by the defendant Redman in payment of gambling losses. It also purports to seek declaratory relief. Respondent’s demurrer to the amended complaint was sustained with leave to amend. Appellant refused to amend and judgment of dismissal was entered, from which appellant appeals.

So far as relevant to the disposition of this appeal, the facts alleged by the amended complaint are as follows:

That…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Marbury v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  3. Fross v. WottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Angier v. WorrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. BelcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. T W M Homes, Inc. v. Atherwood Realty & Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Smith v. WhitmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  3. Pope v. National Aero Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Kelly v. First Astri Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Bierschbach v. HeighoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API