Legal Opinion

Wolff v. Perkins

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 24, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

This is an action by the payee of a negotiable promissory note against his son and the defendant Perkins, as comakers. At the close of the evidence the trial judge directed a verdict for the plaintiff, subject to the exception of the defendant Perkins. The only defences that need to be considered are (1) that the note was given for an illegal consideration, and (2) that it was given without consideration and for the accommodation of the plaintiff.

The defendant Wolff, who is the plaintiff’s son, was arrested in New Hampshire in the summer of 1919 for larceny of automobile tires. The case was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Doyle v. DixonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. Atwood v. FiskMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Hall v. First National Bank of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  4. Graves v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  5. Graves v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pearson v. MulloneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Salem Trust Co. v. DeeryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Leonard v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Smith v. WhitmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  5. Zytka v. DmochowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API