Legal Opinion
Klopfenstein v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 11, 2008No. 105,145PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOUG GABBARD II, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In this accelerated appeal under the OMahoma Administrative Procedures Act (OAPA), 75 O.S.2001 & Supp.2007 §§ 250 through 323, Appellant, Retha C. Klopfen-stein, seeks review of the trial court’s dismissal for want of jurisdiction of her petition seeMng review of an administrative agency order. After reviewing the facts and the law, we reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Appellant is an employee of the OMa-homa Department of Human Services (DHS). In November 2004, Appellant filed a petition with the OMahoma Merit Protection Commission (MPC) alleging that DHS…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Lockett v. Chicago Police BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Indiana National Bank v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Union Bay Preservation Coalition v. Cosmos Development & Administration Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jeremie J. Cooksey v. Cargill Meat Solutions CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Williams v. Board of Oklahoma Polygraph ExaminersCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- French v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Davis v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Davis v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.