Emerzian v. Emerzian
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
The plaintiff was compelled to pay a note given to a bank and signed by himself and the two defendants. He brought this action to recover from the defendant Karl Emerzian as the principal debtor and for contribution from the defendant C. Emerzian as one of the accommodation makers. Among other things, the complaint alleged that the note was executed for the sole benefit of Karl Emerzian and that he received the entire consideration therefor. In his answer, the defendant Karl Emerzian alleged that the proceeds of the note were used for the purposes of a partnership which theretofore existed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Johnson v. RosensteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Collins v. MeisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chung Gee v. Quan WingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Smith v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Lewis v. FirestoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Van Fleet-Durkee, Inc. v. OysterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952