Johnson v. Rosenstein
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
In an action by an ex-partner for advancements alleged to have been made pursuant to an agree ment of copartnership, judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed.
The determination of questions presented by appellant depends upon the language of a contract in writing between the parties. The facts are not disputed, but he contends that the action should have been an equitable one for accounting. By the provisions of said contract it was agreed that both parties should deliver to the enterprise all fixtures, office equipment and merchandise share and share…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Johnstone v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Wilson v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by6 opinions
- Malott v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Collins v. MeisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Emerzian v. EmerzianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Lewis v. FirestoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Van Fleet-Durkee, Inc. v. OysterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.