Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Rosenstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1933No. Docket No. 7984PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

In an action by an ex-partner for advancements alleged to have been made pursuant to an agree ment of copartnership, judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed.

The determination of questions presented by appellant depends upon the language of a contract in writing between the parties. The facts are not disputed, but he contends that the action should have been an equitable one for accounting. By the provisions of said contract it was agreed that both parties should deliver to the enterprise all fixtures, office equipment and merchandise share and share…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Johnstone v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Wilson v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Malott v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Collins v. MeisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Emerzian v. EmerzianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Lewis v. FirestoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Van Fleet-Durkee, Inc. v. OysterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API