Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hurley

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 2, 1978No. 1 CA-CIV 3798PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

The primary issue in this appeal is whether the obligor under a “buy out” agreement is relieved from performance because of the breach by the obligee of a contemporaneous partnership agreement.

This litigation was initiated by plaintiff-appellant, James K. Smith and Sally Cloe Smith, his wife (as James K. Smith is the primary responsible party, he shall hereinafter be referred to as Smith), against defendant-appellee Theodore C. Hurley (Hurley), seeking the dissolution of a partnership allegedly existing between Smith and Hurley and an accounting. This…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Bohmfalk v. VaughanArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Mahurin v. SchmeckArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Reber Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Chandler High School District 202Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Clark v. EdrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Trimble v. American Savings Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  2. Balcor Income Properties, Ltd. v. Arlen Realty, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Dewey v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  4. Caruthers v. UnderhillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. Douglas v. Governing Board of Window Rock Consolidated School District No. 8Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API