Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Boynton v. Gaitskill

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 18, 1931No. 30,225PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an original proceeding in quo warranto, brought in the name of the state on the relation of the attorney-general, questioning the right of defendant to hold the office of judge of the district court, division number two, of Crawford county (judicial district number thirty-eight), and asking that it be adjudged that he have no right or authority to exercise the functions, powers or duties of that office, or to draw or receive the salary therefor, and that he be ousted and excluded from that office and the *390rights, privileges and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holcomb v. SpikesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. People ex rel. Stoddard v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Aikman v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  4. In re HendricksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  5. State ex rel. Jackson v. HutchingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of Arkansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. State v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Vinton v. HoskinsOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co. v. WetschenskySupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  5. Guam Power Authority v. Bishop of GuamDistrict Court, D. Guam · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API