Legal Opinion
Guam Power Authority v. Bishop of Guam
District Court, D. Guam
Decided October 18, 1974No. Civ. 191-73PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUEÑAS, District Judge.
The Guam Power Authority commenced this action on Friday, October 12, 1973, asking this Court to declare Sections 3 and 4 of Public Law 12-42 illegal and void. Public Law 12-42 amended Sections 21003, 21503(4) and 21553 of the Government Code of Guam for the purpose of reducing charges for utility services furnished to nonprofit educational facilities, churches, and publicly owned hospitals.
Ensuing joining of issues, Plaintiffs made a motion for Summary Judgment to declare that Sections 3 and 4 of Public Law 12-42 are illegal and void and of no force and effect.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Whitfield v. SimpsonDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1970
- Williams v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Stubbs v. Texas Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- In Re Di TorioDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1925
- State ex rel. Boynton v. GaitskillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
3Cited by3 opinions
- Awa v. Guam Memorial Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Alton Newton Evangelistic Ass'n v. South Carolina Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Miguel Awa v. Guam Memorial Hospital Authority, Stephanie Rose Hammonds, a Minor, by Robert Lizama, Her Guardian Ad Litem v. Vallop Boonprakong, Mario Garcia v. Tsuyoshi Yamashita, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984