Legal Opinion
Varo, Inc. v. Litton Systems, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided December 13, 1989No. Misc. No. 2919-DPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PITZWATER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Varo, Inc. (“Varo”) appeals an order of the magistrate granting a motion to compel filed by defendant Litton Systems, Inc. (“Litton”). For the reasons that follow, the magistrate’s order is vacated in part and affirmed in part.
I
This is a patent infringement action pending in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Varo alleges that Litton has infringed U.S. Patent No. 4,672,194 (“the ’194 patent”). Litton has counterclaimed for patent invalidity. Litton served a subpoena duces tecum upon Jerry W. Mills, Esq.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Willemijn Houdstermaatschaapij BV v. Apollo Computer Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- Cuno, Inc. v. Pall Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Williams v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
- Robinson v. Texas Automobile Dealers Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. SandsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1993
- AHF Community Development, LLC v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
- In Re Royce Homes, LPUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.