Legal Opinion
Cuno, Inc. v. Pall Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 5, 1988No. CV-86-3197 (JBW)PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CAROL BAGLEY AMON, United States Magistrate.
Introduction
Extensive discovery has been conducted in this action which involves claims and counterclaims for patent infringement in the field of membrane technology. Presently before me is the motion of the defendants Pall Corporation and Pall Ultrafine Filtration Corporation (Pall) made pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37 to compel the plaintiff Cuno Incorporated (Cuno) to pro*200duce documents withheld under claims of attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney work product doctrine.
At my direction, the plaintiff produced for in camera…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Chubb Integrated Systems Ltd. v. National BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Golden Trade v. Lee Apparel Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Leonen v. Johns-ManvilleDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Koumoulis v. Independent Financial Marketing Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- RBS Citizens, N.A. v. HusainDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.