Legal Opinion

Babcock v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 6, 1985No. 84-S-1332-P; CA A31723PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board denying her unemployment benefits. She alleges that EAB’s findings of fact were not supported by substantial evidence; that the findings of fact do not support EAB’s conclusion that she was discharged for misconduct connected with her work; and, finally, that the telephone hearings procedure utilized in her case did not provide her a full and fair hearing.

Petitioner worked as a telephone operator. After a series of absences for a variety of reasons, she was warned that another instance of tardiness or absence for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. City of Klamath Falls v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. Jones v. CrookhamOregon Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Phillips v. VenkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Sterling v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Addona v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API