Legal Opinion
Phillips v. Venker
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 30, 1989No. 105, September Term 1987PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McAULIFFE, Judge.
The plaintiffs in a personal injury action contend they were denied due process of law in connection with a telephone conference hearing of a motion for summary judgment. Interestingly, their complaint is not that the hearing was conducted by telephone, but rather that they were not given adequate notice of the hearing.
I
Goldie May Phillips suffered personal injury when the automobile in which she was riding collided with a parked car. Phillips and her husband (the plaintiffs) sued Dorothy M. Venker, the driver, claiming that Venker’s negligence caused or contributed to the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Blake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Fowler v. Printers II, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Baker, Watts & Co. v. Miles & StockbridgeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane v. TornilloCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Arey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.