Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Jones v. Crookham

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1984No. TC A8304-02506, SC 29923PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*737CAMPBELL, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding by Jones, a resident of Idaho, and Lyle Jones Insurance and Investments, Inc., an Idaho corporation, to compel the trial court to dismiss a complaint filed against it in Multnomah County Circuit Court by Colonial Leasing Company of New England, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation doing business in Oregon. The question presented is whether Oregon’s long-arm statute, ORCP 4L., has sufficient reach to enable an Oregon court to exercise jurisdiction over a non-resident under these facts.1 We hold that it does not.

Jones owned and operated Lyle Jones…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Circus Circus Reno, Inc. v. PopeOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Englert v. MacDonellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Robinson v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Babcock v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Sutherland v. BrennanOregon Supreme Court · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API