Legal Opinion
Sterling v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 13, 1986No. 85-535PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELSON, Associate Judge:
This case presents the question of whether, consistent with due process of law, telephone hearings may be conducted to resolve interstate unemployment compensation claims. We hold that telephone hearings are a permissible means of resolving such claims, but that under the circumstances of this case, the petitioner, Richard Sterling, D.M.D., was denied due process.
Petitioner discharged claimant Curlyn Henderson from her job as a dental assistant on November 7, 1984. Henderson filed an interstate claim for unemployment compensation from Maryland. On November 21, 1984,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hawkins v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Babcock v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Simmons v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lyons v. JordanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Phillips v. VenkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Richard Milburn Public Charter Alternative High School v. CafritzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Brown v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Brown v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.