Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Haggerty

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 20, 2014No. 100463778; A149247PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Husband appeals a dissolution judgment, contending that the trial court’s award of $7,000 per month in maintenance spousal support to wife was not just and equitable and that, in any event, the trial court erred in refusing to enforce a marital settlement agreement between the parties. In husband’s view, the court should have incorporated into the dissolution judgment a purported marital settlement agreement which, according to husband, included agreements “to award Wife $4,000 per month of spousal support, provide her with $50,000 of life insurance, and file joint state and federal taxes…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. In Re the Marriage of KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Matter of Marriage of GrossmanOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In re the Marriage of BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. In re the Marriage of PollockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of HaggertyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Anderson and AbbettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. Anderson and AbbettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. In re the Marriage of NorbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API