In re the Marriage of Haggerty
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.
Husband appeals a dissolution judgment, contending that the trial court’s award of $7,000 per month in maintenance spousal support to wife was not just and equitable and that, in any event, the trial court erred in refusing to enforce a marital settlement agreement between the parties. In husband’s view, the court should have incorporated into the dissolution judgment a purported marital settlement agreement which, according to husband, included agreements “to award Wife $4,000 per month of spousal support, provide her with $50,000 of life insurance, and file joint state and federal taxes…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Marriage of BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- In Re the Marriage of KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Matter of Marriage of GrossmanOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- In re the Marriage of BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- In re the Marriage of PollockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Marriage of HaggertyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Anderson and AbbettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Anderson and AbbettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- In re the Marriage of NorbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016