Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Pollock

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 30, 2013No. DO080256; A147846PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.

Husband appeals from a dissolution judgment, contending that the terms of a marital settlement agreement— executed after mediation — should control the division of the marital property and that the trial court erred in adjusting the property division by ordering that husband pay an additional $300,000 to wife. Husband seeks entry of a judgment specifically enforcing the terms of the marital settlement agreement. Husband also appeals from a supplemental judgment, contending that the trial court erred in denying his petition for attorney fees and costs. Wife cross-appeals from the dissolution…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of McDonnalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Feves v. FevesOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Hofer v. HoferOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. In re the Marriage of EidlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. In re the Marriage of NorrisOregon Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. In Re the Marriage of PollockOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In re the Marriage of HaggertyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Pollock and PollockOregon Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API