Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Norberg

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 14, 2016No. DR15040621; A160535Published

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

Husband appeals a general judgment of dissolution, challenging the trial court’s award of indefinite maintenance spousal support. Husband contends that the court erred by awarding spousal support to wife in an amount and duration different from what the parties had agreed. Alternatively, he argues that the spousal support award is not supported by the record. Because we conclude that the spousal support awarded was within the court’s allowable discretion, we affirm.

Husband does not seek de novo review, and we perceive no reason to engage in such review. ORS 19.415(3)(b); ORAP 5.40(8)(c).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. In Re the Marriage of BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. In re the Marriage of HaggertyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API