Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. Nork

California Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1978No. S.F. 23544PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, Acting C. J.

Defendant Nork alone appeals from a judgment for plaintiff, contending inter alia that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for relief from waiver of jury trial. Codefendant Mercy Hospital, the only party to claim the jury, waived jury trial in the early afternoon of July 23, 1973; Nork did not move for relief from jury waiver until the following morning. As a result of this delay, at the time of Nork’s motion the parties had already argued issues relating to special defenses to the trial judge as a trier of fact, giving rise to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Tammen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Southern California Jockey Club, Inc. v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. People v. CrandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Arnel Development Co. v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API