Legal Opinion

People v. Crandell

California Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1988No. Crim. 22467PublishedCited by 208 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, J.

This is an automatic appeal (Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b))1 from a judgment of death under the 1978 death penalty law (§ 190.1 et seq.). We shall affirm the judgment as to guilt, and as to one of two special circumstance findings, but we shall reverse the judgment as to penalty.

Defendant was charged with the murders of Ernest P. (Ernest) and Edward P. (Edward). The special circumstance of multiple murders (§ 190.2, *848subd. (a)(3)) was alleged as to each murder count. Defendant was also charged with assault with intent to rape and kidnapping of Marie P. (Marie). Defendant was…

2Cases cited89 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by208 opinions

  1. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. OsbandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API