Legal Opinion

Mermer v. Medical Correspondence Services

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1996No. L-95-341PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Glasser, Judge.

This case is before the court on appeal from a judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas. Plaintiffs-appellants, Sally A. Mermer and Dennis Grimshaw, appeal a decision which granted defendants-appellees. Medical Correspondence Services (“Med.Cor”), Smart Corp., and Hospital Correspondence Services (“HCC”), summary judgment on the fourth count of appellants’ complaint, which asserted that appellees charged excessive and unconscionable fees in violation of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act (“OCSPA”), R.C. 1345.01 et seq. For the reasons discussed below, we reverse…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Lorain National Bank v. Saratoga ApartmentsOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Hanson v. KynastOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Garner v. Borcherding Buick, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Webb v. Smart Document Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Ford v. ChartOne, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Biddle v. Warren Gen. Hosp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Patterson v. Central Mills, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
  5. Adlaka v. Valley Electric Consol., 2007-T-0071 (4-4-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API