Legal Opinion

Lorain National Bank v. Saratoga Apartments

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1989No. 88CA004357PublishedCited by 385 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baird, Presiding Judge.

On March 13, 1984, the Lorain National Bank (“bank”) instituted a foreclosure action against Saratoga Apartments, an Ohio general partnership, partners Denis A. Radefeld, Robert E. Roy and Walter B. Webb, and their spouses. The partners and their spouses had executed and delivered promissory notes to the bank upon which the partnership defaulted.

The partners filed a third-party complaint against Khalid Mahmood and others alleging that Mahmood was a member of the partnership and therefore obligated on the notes the partnership executed. After the bank obtained a judgment…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Latta v. KilbournSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Burgess Min. & Const. Corp. v. LeesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Mitchell v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Peskin v. DeutschAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by385 opinions

  1. Russell v. Interim Personnel, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Maust v. Bank One Columbus, N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. v. KolenichOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Blair v. McDonaghOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Hasenfratz v. Warnement, Unpublished Decision (6-5-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006

380 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API