Legal Opinion

Adlaka v. Valley Electric Consol., 2007-T-0071 (4-4-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 2008No. 2007-T-0071PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Appellants, Sat Adlaka and Karen Adlaka, appeal the summary judgment entered in favor of appellees, Valley Electrical Consolidated, Inc. ("VEC") and Molex, Inc. ("Molex"), by the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas on their action for breach of contract and fraud. At issue is whether there is a genuine issue of material fact on either or both of appellants' claims. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

{¶ 2} In or about 1995, appellants began construction of a new 10,000 square foot home on Muirfield Drive, in Canfield, Ohio. While the home was being built, Mr. Adlaka noticed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Kostelnik v. HelperOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Kostelnik v. HelperOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Episcopal Retirement Homes, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Industrial RelationsOhio Supreme Court · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spoerke v. AbruzzoOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Iqbal v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Espyville of Pennsylvania, L.L.C. v. Ron-Bon, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API