Legal Opinion
Kazenercom Too v. Turan Petroleum, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 19, 2008No. Civil Action 08-1339 (ESH)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are individuals and organizations that reside or are based in Kazakhstan and have brought suit for fraud, breach of contract, and a host of other federal and common law claims arising from the sale of an oil concession in Kazakhstan. All but one of the defendants are residents of the Los Angeles area or Kazakhstan, 1 and the relevant events occurred either in California or Kazakhstan. Nonetheless, plaintiffs have chosen to file suit in the District of Columbia even though no party resides here, and the District of Columbia has…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- FC Investment Group LC v. IFX Markets, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Darby v. U.S. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Montgomery v. STG International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Aftab v. GonzalezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Atlantic Recording Corp. v. Project Playlist, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Western Watersheds Project v. PoolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Spaeth v. Michigan State University College of LawDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Shay v. Sight & Sound Systems, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.