Legal Opinion
Western Watersheds Project v. Pool
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 30, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1113PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
This case concerns the Bureau of Land Management’s (“BLM”) obligation to protect land allotments under the Federal Lands Policy Management Act (“FLPMA”), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1701 et seq. Plaintiffs, a conservation group and two of its individual members, filed a complaint alleging that BLM unlawfully withheld and unreasonably delayed implementation of the actions specified in its 2006 Rangeland Health Determinations for Utah public lands. Federal defendants have moved to transfer this case to United States District Court for the District of Utah. For…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Alaska Wilderness League v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- M & N Plastics, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- W. Watersheds Project v. TidwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Western Watersheds Project v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.