Legal Opinion

Wilhelm v. Wilhelm

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1937No. 31,409PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his alternative motion to vacate a judgment and for leave to answer in a divorce suit, or, if that be denied, to relieve him of certain alimony and other payments required thereby.

Plaintiff’s suit for divorce was heard and determined as a default case, defendant not having answered the complaint. He had, however, entered into a stipulation of settlement wherein it was recited that the parties to the suit were “desirous of amicably adjusting and settling” alimony, attorney’s fees, costs of suit, “and title to and ownership of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Sivertsen v. SivertsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Lindbloom v. LindbloomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Laplante v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Laird v. LairdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Garlinger v. GarlingerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Sieber v. SieberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Cahaley v. CahaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Martens v. MartensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. Bissell v. BissellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API